Skip to main content
The Flux Daily
PoliticsLondon, England

Harvard Law's $27 Find Turns Out to Be a Priceless Original Magna Carta

A chance discovery reveals that a manuscript at Harvard Law School, believed to be a mere copy, is actually one of seven original copies of the Magna Carta from 1300.

By Stephen CastleSource: nytimes.com1 min read

In brief

The manuscript, purchased for $27.50, was misidentified for decades until two British historians confirmed its authenticity using advanced imaging techniques, significantly increasing its estimated historical value.

In an unexpected twist of fate, an overlooked manuscript at Harvard Law School has been revealed to be one of the rare original copies of the Magna Carta, dating back to 1300. Acquired for a mere $27.50 in 1946, the water-stained document had spent nearly eight decades tucked away in relative obscurity.British historians David Carpenter and Nicholas Vincent stumbled upon the artifact during their research, with Carpenter commenting on the shocking nature of the find, “I never in all my life expected to discover a Magna Carta.” Their investigation unveiled the manuscript as one of only seven surviving originals from that era, significantly raising its historical importance.To assess the manuscript's authenticity, researchers utilized ultraviolet light and spectral imaging, revealing aspects undetectable by the naked eye. Vincent emphasized the significance of this manuscript, especially as discussions around legal limitations of rulers re-emerge in contemporary discourse.As Harvard addresses pressures from the ongoing political climate, the rediscovery of this foundational document could serve as a poignant reminder of the rule of law—an ethos encapsulated within the Magna Carta itself. The manuscript's astonishing value, clouded in the annals of history, is now practically priceless, overshadowing its previous price tag of under $30. A similar original was sold for a staggering $21.3 million back in 2007, suggesting that Harvard’s treasure is not just a historical artifact but a monumental cultural asset.

Topics

More on this story